How to make ReCaptcha readable (for Nitroflare, DataFile, etc)

No. Take a look at address bar (the one with Utenti > Sami > AppData...) in your image, click on FRD, then you'll see 'plugins' folder.

tong2shot said:

> Copy recaptcha.frp (attached to this post) to FRD plugin folder.

sam2tko said:

> the plugin folder can not find it in the folder of FDR

Well, I'm not trying to confuse ordinary FRD users,
but since I am running FRD with the "-p"
argument/switch (semi-portable mode), my "plugins"
folder is indeed inside FRD's main (installation) folder.

Without the "-p" switch, FRD's "settings" directory
called "Vitysoft" resides on Windows in %APPDATA%;
"FRD" is a subdirectory of "Vitysoft", "plugins"
a subdirectory of "FRD".
So, for WinVista and higher (except Win8 that lack it) ,
Start Button -> "Start Search" input field, type:

%APPDATA%\Vitysoft\FRD

hit enter and you'll be there without launching FRD.

On WinXP, you can type the provided path
once you launch the "Run" window (WIN+R)

Hope I've helped...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/05/2015 03:27PM by TVjunkie.

You can also simply paste %APPDATA%\Vitysoft\FRD into the address bar in Explorer.

I dont testing it.
But did you implement threshold ?

Language: C#
public Bitmap Threshold(Bitmap bmp,int tmin,int tmax)
{
for(y=0;y++;y<bmp.Height)
 {
 for(x=0;x++;x<bmp.Width)
 {
 Color clr=bmp.GetPixel(x,y);
 if(clr.R>tmin && clr.G>tmin && clr.B>tmin && clr.R<tmax && clr.G<tmax && clr.B<tmax)
{
bmp.SetPixel(x,y,Color.black);
}
else
{
bmp.SetPixel(x,y,Color.white);
}
}
}
return bmp;
}

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/05/2015 07:34PM by ad48.

There's breakage if you're using Firefox 42 and SlimJS lightweight nightly version (0.10.0pre). If there's no permission problem, the updated plugin in the first post's attachment will auto-fix that. If somehow there's permission problem, you can manually edit "application.ini" it's inside the slimerjs folder. Change "MaxVersion=41" to "MaxVersion=61" (without quotes). I think we're safe for another week

Also SlimerJS standalone stable version is recommended whether you have Firefox installed or not. It's bulkier than the lightweight version, but it's independent from your Firefox installation. Of course you still can use the lightweight version if you have Firefox installed, but another breakages are possible in the future, we'll never know.

@ad48: Thanks, but it's not that simple



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/06/2015 10:30AM by tong2shot.

tong2shot wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There's breakage if you're using Firefox 42 and
> SlimJS lightweight nightly version (0.10.0pre).
> (snip)
> Also SlimerJS standalone stable version is recommended
> whether you have Firefox installed or not.
> (snip)
> Of course, you still can use the lightweight
> version if you have Firefox installed

Fx 42.0 is the first version in the release (stable) branch
that has been made available also as a 64bit binary
(Win7+ x64; not compatible with WinXP SP2 x64 or
WinVista SP2 x64):
Firefox 42 64-bit version for Windows now available for download
FTP Mozilla

Do you happen to know whether "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip"
is compatible with Fx 42.0 x64 or in that case the use of
the 32bit "slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip" (or possibly
slimerjs-0.10.0pre-win32.zip) is mandatory?

Many thanks...

TVjunkie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do you happen to know whether
> "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip"
> is compatible with Fx 42.0 x64 or in that case the
> use of
> the 32bit "slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip" (or possibly
> slimerjs-0.10.0pre-win32.zip) is mandatory?
>
> Many thanks...

Currently I don't have Win7+ 64bit machine laying around. But I tested "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" (lightweight nightly) with Linux 64bit and 32bit, it works fine. So think it will also work with Win7+ 64bit.

"slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip" (standalone stable) is recommended because it's independent from Firefox installation, it uses its own version of XulRunner. So whatever your version Firefox you're using, it doesn't interfere SlimJS standalone stable installation.

SlimerJS 0.9.6 also has lightweight version (http://download.slimerjs.org/releases/latest-slimerjs-stable/slimerjs-0.9.6.zip), but it doesn't work with Firefox 42, even if MaxVersion=61 is applied for example. In the site's description (https://slimerjs.org/download.html#lightweight), it's stated that the 0.9.6 lightweight edition is compatible with Firefox from 17.0 to 38.0.

How about "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" (lightweight nightly)? At this moment it works with Firefox 42 with MaxVersion=61 applied. But because it depends on Firefox installation, there is no guarantee to work with future version of Firefox.

Users have options of course, whether to install the standalone stable, or the lightweight nightly, or any other versions. But when it comes to support, it would be easier for us to handle if users choose the standalone stable. So unless you know what you're doing, choose the standalone stable (currently slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip).

tong2shot wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But I tested "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip"
> (lightweight nightly) with Linux 64bit and 32bit,
> it works fine. So think it will also work with Win7+ 64bit.

Thanks for your reply, but did you actually test
"slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" on Linux-64bit having
installed previously the 64bit flavour of Fx 42.0:

42.0/linux-x86_64

To rephrase, would "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip"
successfully use the core XUL engine of Fx 42.0 64bit
(obviously in a 64bit architecture), provided
of course one uses the MaxVersionNumber
hack you posted?

My sister runs Fx 42.0 x64 on Win7 SP1 x64,
but I won't be able to test before the start of next
week (back home from trip...).

> So, whatever your version Firefox you're using,
> it doesn't interfere with SlimJS standalone stable installation.
> (snip)
> unless you know what you're doing, choose the standalone
> stable (currently slimerjs-0.9.6-win32.zip).

Would you then advise against using the
slimerjs-0.10.0pre-win32.zip full (standalone)
nightly version linked to in my previous post?
Sorry for being such a PITA, your hard work
and proposed solutions are greatly appreciated

TVjunkie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for your reply, but did you actually test
>
> "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" on Linux-64bit having
> installed previously the 64bit flavour of Fx 42.0:

Yes, I tested "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" with Firefox 42 on both Linux 32bit and 64bit, respective to the arch. And it works fine.


> Would you then advise against using the
> slimerjs-0.10.0pre-win32.zip full (standalone)
> nightly version linked to in my previous post?

The standalone nightly version falls into "any other versions". So yes.

In other news, recaptcha plugin v1.1.0 which contains SlimerJS support code has just been release. If someone has better ideas/approach we can just rewrite the plugin.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 11/08/2015 11:08AM by tong2shot.

tong2shot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, I tested "slimerjs-0.10.0pre.zip" with Firefox 42
> on both Linux 32bit and 64bit,
> respective to the arch. And it works fine.

Thanks for the additional clarification

> In other news, recaptcha plugin v1.1.0, which
> contains SlimerJS support code, has just been
> released.

Complemented by updated solvemediacaptcha
v1.1.3 plugin

Many cheers